Detection as Code

CardinalOps (Cribl): scored, not profiled

Cribl announced on 2026-07-14 that it is acquiring CardinalOps, a detection engineering company, with terms undisclosed and no closing date stated. cardinalops.com now redirects to cribl.io and no product page under the CardinalOps name could be read, so the product no longer ships under its own name and this site does not profile it. cribl.io read 2026-11-04

CardinalOps (Cribl) is scored in the dataset and has no profile because acquired by Cribl (announced 2026-07-14); no longer ships under its own name. This note records what the public pages show and where it sits on the rubric.

The dataset still scores it 3.96 on the weighted rubric, with the evidence limit stated. Cribl's own Cribl Detect page documents ATT&CK posture management and flags broken or noisy rules; it does not mention CardinalOps, so the two are not treated as one product.

Rubric total
3.96 of 10, twelfth of 14 scored
Matrix score
3.5 of 33 (0 documented, 7 partial, 26 not documented)
Ownership
Acquired, Cribl. Cribl announced on 2026-07-14 that it is acquiring CardinalOps, an agentic detection engineering company. Terms were not disclosed in Cribl's release. The release does not state a closing date. cribl.io read 2026-11-03

Cribl announced the acquisition of CardinalOps on 2026-07-14; cardinalops.com returned a 301 redirect to cribl.io on 2026-11-03. The press release is at the Cribl newsroom. CardinalOps product documentation was not found; pages read are Cribl's press release, blog and solution brief.

What the product is described as

Detection engineering product from CardinalOps (acquired by Cribl in 2026) that maps SIEM detection rules to MITRE ATT&CK, finds coverage gaps, and finds broken or noisy rules. Per Cribl's release it now sits inside the Cribl platform; no separate product page remains. cribl.io read 2026-11-03 vendor claim

How CardinalOps (Cribl) scores on the rubric

The score reflects what a reader can find on public pages today, which for a product folded into another company is little. A low score here describes discoverability and not product quality.

CardinalOps (Cribl) on the eight rubric criteria. Part = weight times score over 100; the parts sum to the total.

CriterionWeightScoreStatusReason and source
Rule languages and conversion paths153.0not documentedcardinalops.com redirects to cribl.io; no rule language or SIEM support list is published under the CardinalOps name. cribl.io read 2026-11-04
Git-native workflow and CI/CD183.0not documentedNo git, CI or API documentation found after the redirect. cribl.io read 2026-11-04
Testing153.0not documentedCribl's release does not describe rule testing. cribl.io read 2026-11-04
Coverage analytics127.0partialCribl's 2026-07-14 release says the product maps security controls against adversary behaviour to find and close coverage gaps (vendor claim, no method). vendor claim cribl.io read 2026-11-04
Rule health186.0partialSame release says it finds and fixes broken or noisy rules (vendor claim, no method or metrics). vendor claim cribl.io read 2026-11-04
Versioning and rollback83.0not documentedNot documented. cribl.io read 2026-11-04
Content library size and freshness83.0not documentedNot documented; Cribl Detect lists 8,000+ rule templates but that page does not mention CardinalOps. cribl.io read 2026-11-04
Pricing transparency62.0not documentedNo pricing page; terms of the deal were not disclosed. cribl.io read 2026-11-04
Total, of 101003.96Sum of the eight parts: 0.45 + 0.54 + 0.45 + 0.84 + 1.08 + 0.24 + 0.24 + 0.12

What the public pages do not show

Pricing as published for CardinalOps (Cribl)

No pricing page found. The redirected domain (cardinalops.com now resolves to cribl.io) shows no price, and the acquisition release gives no pricing model. cardinalops.com read 2026-11-03

Named customers of CardinalOps (Cribl)

Names below are as the source page lists them.

Customers named on public pages. Every name is a vendor claim from the page cited in its row.

CustomerSource
Repsolcribl.io read 2026-11-03

Recent releases and news for CardinalOps (Cribl)

Claims CardinalOps (Cribl) makes about itself

Each figure is the vendor's. The evidence grade is defined on the rubric page: A measured by a third party with the method published, B vendor-measured with sample and method, C vendor figure with no method, D figure with no source.

Vendor claims with the evidence grade and who measured.

ClaimGradeMeasured bySource
Enterprise SIEMs have detection coverage for 24 percent of known MITRE ATT&CK techniques (fourth annual State of SIEM Detection Risk report, 2024 edition) vendor claimCvendorhpcwire.com read 2026-11-03
Enterprise SIEMs have detection coverage for 21 percent of MITRE ATT&CK techniques (79 percent uncovered), and 13 percent of SIEM rules are broken vendor claimBvendorprnewswire.com read 2026-11-04
SIEMs have enough telemetry to detect over 90 percent of MITRE ATT&CK techniques vendor claimCvendorprnewswire.com read 2026-11-04

See the full ranking on the rubric page and the grid on the matrix.