Detection as Code

Mate Security vs SOC Prime

Mate Security totals 3.98 and SOC Prime totals 5.11 on the 10 point detection-as-code rubric (sources read 2026-11-03 and 2026-11-04). The pair turns on CI and deployment: SOC Prime describes it only in part, or as a vendor claim, and Mate Security publishes nothing on it. Mate Security ranks eleventh of fourteen on the proposed scores.

The difference that decides this pair

The largest weighted gap on the rubric is rule languages and conversion paths: SOC Prime scores 8.0 against 3.0 for Mate Security, which is 0.75 of the 10 point total.

On CI and deployment, SOC Prime lists repository sourcing and CI/CD adaptation on product pages with no workflow shown, while Mate Security documents no repo sync, pull-request flow, CLI or API for detections. socprime.com read 2026-11-03 mate.security read 2026-11-04

Rubric side by side

Mate Security totals 3.98 and SOC Prime totals 5.11 out of 10.

Rubric criteria for Mate Security and SOC Prime, scores out of 10. A plus marks a criterion where SOC Prime scores higher, a minus where Mate Security does.

MarkerCriterionWeightMate SecuritySOC Prime
+Rule languages and conversion paths153.08.0
+Git-native workflow and CI/CD183.04.0
+Testing153.05.0
Coverage analytics126.06.0
-Rule health186.03.0
+Versioning and rollback83.04.0
+Content library size and freshness84.07.0
+Pricing transparency63.05.0
Total1003.985.11

The 33 capabilities as a diff

Read it as a diff from Mate Security to SOC Prime: 11 of 33 rows differ. A plus marks a row where SOC Prime documents more (7 rows), a minus a row where Mate Security documents more (4 rows). Rows with no marker match.

Capability rows for Mate Security and SOC Prime, grouped. Changed rows are shaded and carry a marker.

MarkerCapabilityMate SecuritySOC Prime
Languages
SOC Prime documents moreSigma nativeMate Security, Sigma native: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Sigma native: partialpartial
SOC Prime documents moreSigma conversionMate Security, Sigma conversion: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Sigma conversion: partialpartial
YARA-LMate Security, YARA-L: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, YARA-L: not documentednot documented
SPLMate Security, SPL: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, SPL: not documentednot documented
KQLMate Security, KQL: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, KQL: not documentednot documented
EQL or ES|QLMate Security, EQL or ES|QL: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, EQL or ES|QL: not documentednot documented
PythonMate Security, Python: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Python: not documentednot documented
Visual builderMate Security, Visual builder: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Visual builder: not documentednot documented
YARAMate Security, YARA: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, YARA: not documentednot documented
Lucene or KQL-likeMate Security, Lucene or KQL-like: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Lucene or KQL-like: not documentednot documented
Source control and CI
SOC Prime documents moreGit syncMate Security, Git sync: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Git sync: partialpartial
PR deployMate Security, PR deploy: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, PR deploy: not documentednot documented
CLIMate Security, CLI: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, CLI: not documentednot documented
Rule APIMate Security, Rule API: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Rule API: not documentednot documented
SOC Prime documents moreCI examplesMate Security, CI examples: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, CI examples: partialpartial
Env promotionMate Security, Env promotion: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Env promotion: not documentednot documented
Testing
Unit testsMate Security, Unit tests: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Unit tests: not documentednot documented
ReplayMate Security, Replay: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Replay: not documentednot documented
Synthetic eventsMate Security, Synthetic events: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Synthetic events: not documentednot documented
Backtest reportsMate Security, Backtest reports: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Backtest reports: not documentednot documented
Test coverageMate Security, Test coverage: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Test coverage: not documentednot documented
Coverage analytics
ATT&CK mapMate Security, ATT&CK map: partialpartialSOC Prime, ATT&CK map: partialpartial
Gap viewMate Security, Gap view: partialpartialSOC Prime, Gap view: partialpartial
SOC Prime documents moreData sourcesMate Security, Data sources: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Data sources: partialpartial
Mate Security documents moreLog source healthMate Security, Log source health: partialpartialSOC Prime, Log source health: not documentednot documented
Rule health
Mate Security documents moreNoisy rulesMate Security, Noisy rules: partialpartialSOC Prime, Noisy rules: not documentednot documented
Mate Security documents moreBroken rulesMate Security, Broken rules: partialpartialSOC Prime, Broken rules: not documentednot documented
Field driftMate Security, Field drift: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Field drift: not documentednot documented
Rule costMate Security, Rule cost: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Rule cost: not documentednot documented
Mate Security documents moreLifecycleMate Security, Lifecycle: partialpartialSOC Prime, Lifecycle: not documentednot documented
Library
Library countMate Security, Library count: partialpartialSOC Prime, Library count: partialpartial
SOC Prime documents moreCommunityMate Security, Community: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Community: partialpartial
SOC Prime documents moreCadenceMate Security, Cadence: not documentednot documentedSOC Prime, Cadence: partialpartial

documenteddocumentedpartialpartialnot documentednot documented

Sources for the rows that differ

Verdict by buyer type

Which of the two fits each kind of team.

BuyerVerdict
Microsoft Sentinel estateSOC Prime is the only one of the pair with any stated route: it claims Sigma translation to dozens of languages and names none; Mate Security is described by Google as working with existing SIEM tools, with no Sentinel connector documented.
Elastic estateSOC Prime is the only one of the pair with any stated route: it claims Sigma translation to dozens of languages and names none; Mate Security is described by Google as working with existing SIEM tools, with no Elastic connector documented.
Splunk estateSOC Prime is the only one of the pair with any stated route: it claims Sigma translation to dozens of languages and names none; Mate Security is described by Google as working with existing SIEM tools, with no Splunk connector documented.
Google SecOps estateSOC Prime is the only one of the pair with any stated route: it claims Sigma translation to dozens of languages and names none; Mate Security is described by Google as working with existing SIEM tools, with no Google SecOps connector documented.
a team starting from scratch with SigmaSOC Prime is the better fit: it claims Sigma conversion to dozens of targets that its pages do not name; Mate Security does not say which rule language its agents write.

When to pick each

Mate Security: Pick Mate Security when rule health is the deciding need: it says detections are tuned or deprecated from investigation outcomes (vendor claim) and publishes no definitions or thresholds.

SOC Prime: Pick SOC Prime when testing is the deciding need: it says Uncoder AI validates translated rules and describes no replay or unit test method. It also leads on CI and deployment.

Profiles: Mate Security, SOC Prime. Alternatives: to Mate Security, to SOC Prime.