Google Security Operations vs Sekoia.io
Google Security Operations totals 6.83 and Sekoia totals 3.46 on the 10 point detection-as-code rubric (sources read 2026-11-03 and 2026-11-04). Google Security Operations leads by 3.37 points. The pair turns on rule languages: Sekoia documents it in full, and Google Security Operations documents it only in part, or as a vendor claim. Neither publishes anything on pricing.
The difference that decides this pair
The largest weighted gap on the rubric is rule health: Google Security Operations scores 8.0 against 3.0 for Sekoia.io, which is 0.90 of the 10 point total.
The pair splits on rule languages: Sekoia runs native Sigma YAML, including event_count, value_count and temporal correlation, alongside its own SOL queries, and Google Security Operations supports YARA-L 2.0 as its one native rule language and documents no Sigma conversion path. docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03 docs.cloud.google.com read 2026-11-03
Rubric side by side
Google Security Operations totals 6.83 and Sekoia.io totals 3.46 out of 10.
Rubric criteria for Google Security Operations and Sekoia.io, scores out of 10. A plus marks a criterion where Sekoia.io scores higher, a minus where Google Security Operations does.
| Marker | Criterion | Weight | Google Security Operations | Sekoia.io |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Rule languages and conversion paths | 15 | 7.0 | 4.0 |
| - | Git-native workflow and CI/CD | 18 | 8.0 | 3.5 |
| - | Testing | 15 | 8.0 | 3.5 |
| - | Coverage analytics | 12 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| - | Rule health | 18 | 8.0 | 3.0 |
| - | Versioning and rollback | 8 | 8.0 | 3.0 |
| - | Content library size and freshness | 8 | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Pricing transparency | 6 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
| Total | 100 | 6.83 | 3.46 |
The 33 capabilities as a diff
Read it as a diff from Google Security Operations to Sekoia.io: 13 of 33 rows differ. A plus marks a row where Sekoia.io documents more (4 rows), a minus a row where Google Security Operations documents more (9 rows). Rows with no marker match.
Capability rows for Google Security Operations and Sekoia.io, grouped. Changed rows are shaded and carry a marker.
| Marker | Capability | Google Security Operations | Sekoia.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| Languages | |||
| Sekoia.io documents more | Sigma native | not documented | documented |
| Sigma conversion | not documented | not documented | |
| Google Security Operations documents more | YARA-L | documented | not documented |
| SPL | not documented | not documented | |
| KQL | not documented | not documented | |
| EQL or ES|QL | not documented | not documented | |
| Python | not documented | not documented | |
| Visual builder | not documented | not documented | |
| YARA | not documented | not documented | |
| Sekoia.io documents more | Lucene or KQL-like | not documented | partial |
| Source control and CI | |||
| Google Security Operations documents more | Git sync | documented | not documented |
| Google Security Operations documents more | PR deploy | partial | not documented |
| Google Security Operations documents more | CLI | documented | not documented |
| Rule API | documented | documented | |
| CI examples | not documented | not documented | |
| Env promotion | not documented | not documented | |
| Testing | |||
| Sekoia.io documents more | Unit tests | not documented | partial |
| Replay | documented | documented | |
| Google Security Operations documents more | Synthetic events | partial | not documented |
| Backtest reports | partial | partial | |
| Test coverage | not documented | not documented | |
| Coverage analytics | |||
| ATT&CK map | documented | documented | |
| Google Security Operations documents more | Gap view | documented | partial |
| Data sources | partial | partial | |
| Log source health | partial | partial | |
| Rule health | |||
| Noisy rules | partial | partial | |
| Google Security Operations documents more | Broken rules | documented | partial |
| Field drift | not documented | not documented | |
| Google Security Operations documents more | Rule cost | documented | partial |
| Lifecycle | documented | documented | |
| Library | |||
| Sekoia.io documents more | Library count | partial | documented |
| Google Security Operations documents more | Community | documented | not documented |
| Cadence | partial | partial | |
documentedpartialnot documented
Sources for the rows that differ
- Sigma native (Sekoia.io documents more). Google Security Operations: not documented, No page read for this platform names this feature docs.cloud.google.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: documented, 'Sigma Rules' page: native Sigma YAML, including event_count, value_count and temporal correlation docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
- YARA-L (Google Security Operations documents more). Google Security Operations: documented, 'Rules Editor' for YARA-L 2.0 rules; 'Generate YARA-L with Gemini' docs.cloud.google.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: not documented, No page read for this platform names this feature docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
- Lucene or KQL-like (Sekoia.io documents more). Google Security Operations: not documented, No page read for this platform names this feature docs.cloud.google.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: partial, 'SOL' (Sekoia Operating Language) queries run as scheduled detection rules; syntax relation to KQL not stated docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
- Git sync (Google Security Operations documents more). Google Security Operations: documented, chronicle/detection-rules README: 'rule manager' tool for a Detection-as-Code pipeline via the REST API raw.githubusercontent.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: not documented, Git module action triggers playbooks on repository file changes; no rule sync documented docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
- PR deploy (Google Security Operations documents more). Google Security Operations: partial, README describes a DaC pipeline for rules; no pull request trigger described raw.githubusercontent.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: not documented, No page read for this platform names this feature docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
- CLI (Google Security Operations documents more). Google Security Operations: documented, README: tools/content_manager is a 'CLI tool used to manage rules and other content' via the REST API raw.githubusercontent.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: not documented, No page read for this platform names this feature docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
- Unit tests (Sekoia.io documents more). Google Security Operations: not documented, No page read for this platform names this feature docs.cloud.google.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: partial, 'Rule testing' with 'Test pattern' on historical data; no sample-event test cases docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
- Synthetic events (Google Security Operations documents more). Google Security Operations: partial, 'Event simulation' delivers realistic threat sequences into ingestion; pre-GA feature docs.cloud.google.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: not documented, No page read for this platform names this feature docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
- Gap view (Google Security Operations documents more). Google Security Operations: documented, MITRE dashboard 'helps you find gaps in your threat coverage' docs.cloud.google.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: partial, Matrix cells colored by rule count; gaps are inferred from empty cells, no gap report named docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
- Broken rules (Google Security Operations documents more). Google Security Operations: documented, 'Rule errors': compilation and runtime errors during test, live run and retrohunt; Rules dashboard docs.cloud.google.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: partial, 'Lag management' keeps SOL rules from missing late events; no failed-rule alerting on pages read docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
- Rule cost (Google Security Operations documents more). Google Security Operations: documented, 'Monitor rule performance': Rule Observability dashboard, latencyMetrics, quotas on rule count and complexity docs.cloud.google.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: partial, 'Performance considerations' in testing best practices; no per-rule telemetry docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
- Library count (Sekoia.io documents more). Google Security Operations: partial, 'Curated detections' rule sets by category; page read gives no total docs.cloud.google.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: documented, Sekoia Verified Rules: 'more than 1000 rules' docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
- Community (Google Security Operations documents more). Google Security Operations: documented, chronicle/detection-rules repo: rules/community holds 'YARA-L rules created by members of the Google SecOps team and user community' raw.githubusercontent.com read 2026-11-03. Sekoia.io: not documented, No page read for this platform names this feature docs.sekoia.com read 2026-11-03.
Verdict by buyer type
Which of the two fits each kind of team.
| Buyer | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Google SecOps estate | Google Security Operations is the better fit: it runs the estate natively, with YARA-L rules, a Rules API and a Content Manager CLI; Sekoia documents no Google SecOps path. |
| a team starting from scratch with Sigma | Sekoia is the better fit: it runs native Sigma YAML, correlation rules included, but documents no CI workflow; Google Security Operations documents YARA-L and no Sigma path. |
| Microsoft Sentinel estate | Neither Google Security Operations nor Sekoia documents a path for this buyer, so it does not separate them. |
When to pick each
Google Security Operations: Pick Google Security Operations when testing is the deciding need: it tests a rule over a time range, retrohunts against historical data and offers event simulation (pre-GA). It also leads on CI and deployment.
Sekoia.io: Pick Sekoia when rule languages is the deciding need: it runs native Sigma YAML, including event_count, value_count and temporal correlation, alongside its own SOL queries. It also leads on library size.
Profiles: Google Security Operations, Sekoia.io. Alternatives: to Google Security Operations, to Sekoia.io.